Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Larry Robinson, Jr. v. Burnham, et al
as 23-1764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LEE RAY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER BURNHAM, in their individual capacity and NURSE LORI BLUE, in their individual capacity
Robinson et al v.United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Robinson, Harold Knox and Michael Kimbrell
Defendant:
USA, Torey Johnson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RAY ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray Robinson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01324
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 23-30020
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 5:2022cv05335
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 22-30358
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Sherman et al
as 5:2021cv04104
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Kayla Sherman, Jerry Goodwin, Walter Trovliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
