Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BROWN v. ERIE COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00251
Defendant:
MD DAVID PAUL, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., GARY L. PETERSON and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corinth Capital L L C v. H & H X-Ray Services Inc
as 3:2020cv00916
Plaintiff:
Corinth Capital L L C as successor-in-interest to doing business as Energy Management Systems
Defendant:
H & H X-Ray Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cotterman v. Jan X-Ray Services, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01235
Plaintiff:
Ernest Cotterman
Defendant:
Jan X-Ray Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Prompt Medical Care, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv01744
Defendant:
Andrew Cordaro, M.D., Da Vinci Medical, P.C., IK X-ray Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Geico Casualty Company, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JAN X-Ray Services, Inc. v. UT Quality, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01203
Plaintiff:
JAN X-Ray Services, Inc.
Defendant:
UT Quality, Inc. and Met, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAllister v. Quality Mobile X-Ray Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Candy McAllister
Defendant:
Quality Mobile X-Ray Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JAN X-Ray Services, Inc. v. UT Quality, Inc.
as 4:2010cv03958
Plaintiff:
JAN X-Ray Services, Inc.
Defendant:
UT Quality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAN-FER Utility Services, LLC v. H&H X-Ray Services, Inc.
as 4:2010cv02911
Plaintiff:
CAN-FER Utility Services, LLC
Defendant:
H & H X-Ray Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
