Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Simpson Jr. v. LLAB Trucking Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00333
Defendant:
Robert Dijon Morrisey and LLAB Trucking Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Simpson Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanna v. Farris et al
as 3:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Hanna
Defendant:
Silencio Global Inc. and Ray Simpson Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Padilla et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03404
Plaintiff:
Ronell Massie, Tamara McCullough, Bernard Balck and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01199
Plaintiff:
Ronell Massie, Tamara McCullough, Bernard Balck and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., National Foam Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Tony Simpson
as 15-11079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TONY RAY SIMPSON
McClelland et al v. New Orleans and Gulf Coast Railway Company
as 2:2014cv01473
Plaintiff:
Michael McClelland , Jo Ann McClelland , Joseph Badalamenti and others
Defendant:
New Orleans and Gulf Coast Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Bond et al
as 1:2013cv01170
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Simpson
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Tonya Fisher and Cedrick Tyus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Bond et al
as 1:2013cv01072
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Simpson
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Elma Walker, Tonya Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02716
Plaintiff:
Brenda Simpson and Ray Simpson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. McCall
as 9:2011cv00273
Petitioner:
Dennis Ray Simpson, Jr
Respondent:
M McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
