Cases 1 - 10 of 1,854
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Trice
Defendant:
Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Lindquist v. Vicki Taylor, et al
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, individually and officially as Assistant Chief Judge in Dakota County (DC), First Judicial District, Keith M. Ellison, officially as Minnesota Attorney General, Matt Smith, officially as DC Manager and others
Raymond McElroy v. Jonah Beadles, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
Raymond McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles, Deputy Sheriff, Greene County Jail and James Arnott, Sheriff, Greene County Jail
Cooper v. Orr et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Cooper
Defendant:
Ryan Orr and Kenneth R. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatten v. USA
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hatten
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Raymond Lewis
as 24-1751
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raymond Antonio Lewis
Lee v. Dubuque County Jail
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee, Sr
Defendant:
Dubuque County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
