Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01361
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America
Raymond Aigbekaen v. US
as 23-6216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Galliani
as 3:2022cv03365
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Raymond A. Galliani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aigbekaen v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02890
Plaintiff:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
Defendant:
United States of America
Aigbekaen v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01920
Plaintiff:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
Defendant:
United States of America
USA v. Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2019mc00183
Defendant:
Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Raymond Charlton
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Aigbekaen v. United States Of America
as 1:2019cv03017
Plaintiff:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
Defendant:
United States Of America
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kraft et al
as 1:2019cv01788
Defendant:
Wisekraft Solutions, LLC and Raymond Oliver Kraft, Jr.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $42,800.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant:
$42,800.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
RAYMOND LEWIS, SR. and RAYMOND LEWIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2008 BLACK MERCEDES BENZ G55, VIN NO. WDCYR71E58X175031, GUAM LICENSE PLATE NO. MG2342 et al
as 1:2019cv00002
Defendant:
$9,016 IN U.S. CURRENCY, LADY'S PLATINUM RING WITH ONE ROUND BRILLIANT CUT DIAMOND 2.95 CARATS (ESTIMATED), 2013 YELLOW SUZUKI HAYABUSA GSX1300RAZL3, VIN NO. JS1GX72B3D2100292 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Raymond John Martinez and Juanita Marie Quitugua Moser
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
