Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Adames et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07488
Plaintiff:
Abel D. Adames, Edward Alber, Edward Allen and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Cain v. Rogers et al
as 4:2026cv12976
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lewis Cain
Defendant:
Rogers, Redman, Kuntz and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ho v. Fraizer et al
as 1:2026cv04855
Defendant:
Schnahider Demostenas, Santiago, A. Fraizer and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daiscia Redman v. Jefferson County, OH Jail, et al
as 26-3581
Plaintiff:
DAISCIA NICOLE REDMAN
Defendant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH JAIL, CAPTAIN SHAWN LIVINGSTON, In his official and individual capacity and LIEUTENANT JASON FOGLE, In his official and individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
