Cases 61 - 70 of 540
Reese v. Sheriff Jefferson County
as 1:2021cv00105
Respondent:
Sheriff Jefferson County
Petitioner:
Demonte Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Reese McKinney, D.T. Marshall and County of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Dr. Woodall, Burl Cain, Tate Reese and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Reese
as 20-40882
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeffrey Scott Reese, also known as Jeffery Scott Reese
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Sam v. Reese et al
as 6:2020cv01492
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sam
Defendant:
Brian Leslie Reese and Great West Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cortez v. Custard et al
as 2:2020cv03110
Plaintiff:
Lemcy Cortez
Defendant:
Deputy Thomas Custard, Deputy Brittney Reese, Sheriff Jospeh P. Lopinto, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives et al
as 6:2020cv01438
Defendant:
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Regina Lombardo, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Plaintiff:
The Second Amendment Foundation, Caleb Reese, Joseph Granich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922
Bennett v. Hill County Jail et al
as 6:2020cv00811
Defendant:
Zonelle Orozco, Scott Rowe, Hill County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv00475
Defendant:
Tommy Brown, Micah Fenton, Felicia Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Matlock, Kelly Reese, Vickie Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
