Cases 1 - 10 of 98
United Credit Recovery, LLC v. Bexton et al
as 1:2018mc00836
Defendant:
Michael Scata, I Recovery LLC, Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
United Credit Recovery, LLC v. Bexten et al
as 2:2018ms00110
Defendant:
Michael Scata, Jason Bexten, Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
United Credit Recovery LLC v. Bexten et al
as 2:2018mc00063
Defendant:
Michael Scata, I Recovery LLC, Imperial Recovery Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery LLC
NOT USED
as 2:2018cv02215
Defendant:
Michael Scata, I Recovery LLC, Jason Bexten and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
Landmark Financial Solutions, LLC v. Elam et al
as 4:2014cv01883
Plaintiff:
Landmark Financial Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Willie L. Elam, Alesia Elam, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Credit Recovery, LLC v. Bexten et al
as 6:2011cv01714
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Jason Bexten , Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC , I Recovery LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silva v. Carruthers et al
as 3:2011cv01365
Plaintiff:
Marussia Silva
Defendant:
Dennis Scott Carruthers, Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc., Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Setters v. Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
Brian Setters
Defendant:
Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tucker v. Regent Asset Management Solutions, et al
as 5:2011cv02335
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tucker
Defendant:
Michael Scata and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
