Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00507
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Bridges et al
as 2:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harris
Defendant:
CO Bridges, Arney, M Neveu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Watson
as 22-50579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Watson, Hillsboro Police Officer, Vernon Busby, Hill County Sheriff Deputy and Officer Rogers
Harris v. Lee et al
as 2:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harris
Defendant:
James CM Lee, Areig Awad and Bo Stanbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Watson et al
as 6:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harris
Defendant:
FNU Watson, Vernon Busby and Correctional Officer FNU Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv02657
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harris
Defendant:
NFN Watson, Vernon Busby and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00297
Respondent:
Burl Cain, James Caldwell and Louisiana State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
Reginald Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald Harris v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 09-4188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, Warden and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
