Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lewis v. Challenge Mgf. Company LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Lewis
Defendant:
Challenge Mgf. Company LLC, Joel Borders, Rodney Penson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard v. J&B Hauling, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
Shaun E. Howard
Defendant:
J&B Hauling, LLC, Reginald Mitchell and KSJ Enterprises USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Reginald Mitchell
Defendant:
Eric Hinyard and Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briscoe v. Office of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance et al
as 1:2017cv03005
Plaintiff:
Percy Briscoe
Defendant:
Office of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (OFEGLI), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (METLIFE) , Toni Winsett and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8701
MITCHELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01420
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MITCHELL
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Does et al
as 3:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
TAS Rights Management, LLC
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does, Various XYZ Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MITCHELL v. MOODY et al
as 7:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MITCHELL
Defendant:
AVERY MOODY and SELESKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mitchell et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. et al
as 1:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Reginald Mitchell and Jamela Mitchell
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. , Mortgage Electronic Registration System and Does I-X
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
