Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Aaron Roberts v. Corey Walker
as 15-6507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON B. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY WALKER, CCMSII, R. EBERSOLE, Lt., A. HARTLE, COMSII and others
Defendant:
DOCTOR LIN QUILLO, DOCTOR KEVEN JOHNSON and RN MICHELLE AUTREY
Reinhardt v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Melody Dawn Reinhardt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aaron Roberts v. Corey Walker
as 14-6896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON B. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY WALKER, CCMSII, R. EBERSOLE, Lt., A. HARTLE, COMSII and others
Defendant:
DOCTOR LIN QUILLO, DOCTOR KEVEN JOHNSON and RN MICHELLE AUTREY
Reinhardt v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17491
Plaintiff:
Devreau Reinhardt
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Walker et al
as 1:2014cv00720
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Roberts
Defendant:
Corey Walker, R. Ebersole, A. Hartle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinhardt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23010
Plaintiff:
Margaret T. Reinhardt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reinhardt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02786
Plaintiff:
Katherine Reinhardt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reinhardt v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06151
Plaintiff:
Karen Reinhardt
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. South Carolina State University et al
as 5:2012cv02030
Plaintiff:
Reinhardt Brown
Defendant:
South Carolina State University , G Dale Wesson and Charles A Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
