Cases 1 - 10 of 16
NIXON v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (DENTIST) et al
as 2:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (DENTIST), (ACTING) WARDEN ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL WARDEN, DOUG WILLIAMS (CEO) RENEWAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PARRAN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2017cv01587
Plaintiff:
RANDALL EUGENE PARRAN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, RENEWAL INC., ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv00238
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
M. Pugh, United States Marshal, Pam Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v RENEWAL INC., et al
as 2:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RENEWAL INC., AARON, PAUL (DOE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
