Cases 1 - 10 of 2,893
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joe Teague, Jr. v. Arthur Gepner
as 24-1393
Plaintiff:
JOE EDWARDS TEAGUE, JR.
Defendant:
ARTHUR L. GEPNER, for Cherokee Federal d/b/a CN3S, BOBBY DETTMER, Flux Resources LLC, CLINT BUCKLEY, Flux Resources LLC and others
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Angela Carson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Lucas Anderson, Joshua Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Washington et al v. Just Ice Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Campbell Washington, RockSteady Industries International LLC doing business as RSZ Media, RockSteady Recordz and others
Defendant:
Just Ice Campbell, Judges Ben Darvil, Jr., Diana Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
