Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Richard Keller v. Cheryl Eplett
as 23-1340
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. KELLER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERYL EPLETT, Warden
Edgefield Holdings, LLC v. Keller et al
as 1:2020cv00326
Plaintiff:
Edgefield Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Richard L. Keller and Irena Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keller v. Jess
as 2:2019cv01833
Petitioner:
Richard L Keller
Respondent:
Cathy A Jess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Henneberry v. County of Alameda, et al
as 16-17049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HENNEBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, California, CITY OF ALAMEDA, California, CITY OF NEWARK, California and others
Hancock Bank v. Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc., Richard L. Keller, Bulls Eye Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henneberry v. County of Alameda, California et al
as 3:2016cv02766
Plaintiff:
John Henneberry
Defendant:
County of Alameda, California, City of Alameda, California, City of Newark, California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Sherwin Williams Company, The et al
as 7:2015cv01560
Plaintiff:
Richard A Keller
Defendant:
Sherwin Williams Company, The and KST Coatings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38933
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. KELLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KELLER v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv64671
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. KELLER, SR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard E. Keller, Sr. v. American Standard, Inc., et al.
as VAE/2:10-CV-09665
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Keller, Sr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
