Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Davis v. Keller et al
as 7:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Richard Brandon Davis
Defendant:
Major C. Keller, Major D. Stokes, Captain Booer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Chick's Prime Meat Market Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01161
Defendant:
Richard Brandon Chick, Chick's Prime Meat Market Inc. d/b/a Chick's Prime Meat Market and Brandon Chick
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
BRANDON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15597
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD BRANDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence v. Prokhorov
as 1:2022cv01115
Plaintiff:
Richard Brandon Lawrence, Jr.
Defendant:
Mikhail Prokhorov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Love et al v. Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
John Richard Love, Robert Roy O'Bday, Jr., Julise Capps and others
Defendant:
Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Giddens v. Hunter et al
as 4:2021cv01047
Plaintiff:
Richard Brandon Giddens
Defendant:
John Bernard Hunter and Empire Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02605
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRANDON MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01206
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FOX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71708
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRANDON FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oviatt v. University of Michigan Regents et al
as 2:2018cv11819
Plaintiff:
Jill S. Oviatt
Defendant:
University of Michigan Regents , Lee C. Bollinger and Richard Brandon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
