Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Faith Lindsey v. Luke Gatlin, et al
as 20-2955
Defendant / Appellee:
Vonda Duncan, Central Bank Assistance Vice President/Bookkeeping Supervisor, Robert Steele, Police Officer, Luke Gatlin, Detective and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Faith Lindsey
Dos Bowies LP et al v. Ackerman et al
as 1:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walter, Jason Morris, Benjamin Phillips and others
Defendant:
James A. Seijas, Michael W Ackerman and Quan Tran
Stross v. Richard Cain and Company et al
as 1:2019cv01047
Defendant:
KW Management LLC, Richard Cain and Company and Richard Allen Cain
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Lindsey v. Gatlin et al
as 2:2019cv04070
Defendant:
Central Bank Lake of the Ozarks, Vonda Duncan, Luke Gatlin and others
Plaintiff:
Faith Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28401
Plaintiff:
Melissa Cain and Richard Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cain v. Timme et al
as 1:2011cv01981
Petitioner:
David Richard Cain
Respondent:
Rae Timme and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Cain
as 2:2010cv01182
Plaintiff:
Roy E. White
Defendant:
Richard Cain
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
