Cases 1 - 10 of 38
DeQuincy Smith v. Ahmari Caffey, et al
as 23-3322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Ahmari Caffey, Sergeant, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Head, Field Captain, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Maurice Culclager, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and others
Azhar Lal v. USA, et al
as 22-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZHAR LAL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HENRY CATTO, JAMES BAKER and others
Smith v. Caffey et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant:
Ahmari Caffey, Head, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeckeya Perry v. Ivory McDaniel, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zeckeya Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Ivory T. McDaniel, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, Wendy Kelley, Previous Director and others
Morningstar v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Khanis-Orion Morningstar
Defendant:
Doc King, William Freeman, Richard Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorn v. Kelley et al
as 4:2020cv00903
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dana McCoy, LaSonya Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lal v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00349
Defendant:
Les Murphy, Dallosta Delores, Robert Springer and others
Plaintiff:
Azhar Lal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AINA V. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 3:2019cv00162
Defendant:
CRNP RICHARD CLARK, CRNP PATRICK NAGLE, PA-C CASEY THORNLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE YANICK AINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Clark et al v. Dobey et al
as 8:2019cv01846
Defendant:
John Does 1-8, Dexter Bowman, Adell Dobey and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Clark and Shawn Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Stone v. Richard Clark
as 17-2810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Lee Stone
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Clark, Lieutenant, Maximum Security Unit, ADC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
