Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Wittman v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2013cv00801
Plaintiff: Mark Daniel Wittman
Defendant: Birmingham, City of, A C Roper and Manuel Richard Diaz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff: Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Minnesota Life Insurance Company et al v. Durso et al
as 1:2013cv00252
Defendant: Salvatore Durso , Centennial Associates Inc. , Principal Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Minnesota Life Insurance Company and Securian Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03429
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Palacios v. Crystal City, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant: Crystal City, Texas, Councilman Richard Diaz, Mayor Ricardo S. Lopez and others
Plaintiff: Diana Palacios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Cates et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00744
Plaintiff: Richard Diaz
Defendant: Matthew Cates, Kathy Mendoza-Powers, James Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?