Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Hamilton Swart, III v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON H. SWART, III and RICHARD EARL DASILVA
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Cumby, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Cumby, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HENSARLING v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv17921
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL HENSARLING, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, CHIP SIMMONS and ROBERT LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21886
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL EDWARDS, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOUTZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20425
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL HOUTZ, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOLDENPENNY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04367
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL GOLDENPENNY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04307
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gourley v. Warden, Everglades Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv20245
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Gourley
Defendant:
Warden, Everglades Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Kemp
as 21-11152
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Earl Kemp
Greene v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2021cv08550
Plaintiff:
Richard Earle Greene
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
