Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Holstein Supply, Inc. v. Murphy
as 6:2014cv01365
Plaintiff:
Holstein Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01248
Plaintiff:
Jon Richard Murphy
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ZUNIGA v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
as 2:2014cv02973
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION, ONE WEST BANK and others
Plaintiff:
ISABEL DASSINGER, MONTELL LOCEY, JILL BROWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Murphy et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv12321
Plaintiff:
Tamara Murphy and Richard Murphy
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-12321
Plaintiff:
Tamara K. Murphy and Richard Murphy
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Hernandez et al v. County of Monterey et al
as 5:2013cv02354
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hernandez , Robert Yancey , Richard Murphy and others
Defendant:
County of Monterey, Monterey County Sheriff's Office and California Forensic Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Murphy v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 9:2011cv81365
Plaintiff:
Richard Murphy
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Halter v. Conover et al
as 7:2011cv00241
Defendant:
Nurse Diane Bolinger, Bruce Conover and Dr. Richard Murphy
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norbert Halter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STITOU v. PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
AHMED STITOU
Defendant:
PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS TOWNSHIP, ANDY VAN ORDEN, RICHARD MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
