Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Santana v. Benavides Baccus et al
as 1:2021cv04338
Defendant:
Mark A. Benavides, Ed Lewis, Alberto Cribiore and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Erskine v. Delaware Department of Corrections (DDOC) et al
as 1:2020cv01771
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine
Defendant:
J.T.V.C.C S.Lt Orlando DeJesus, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis, J.T.V.C.C Lt Heishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons et al v. Hampstead Hospital
as 1:2019cv01154
Defendant:
Hampstead Hospital
Plaintiff:
Theresa Parsons and Richard Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Agricultural Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Agricultural Dept., Dept. of Justice, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Archette Wellness Group Inc v. Seychelle Environmental Technologies Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00940
Plaintiff:
Archette Wellness Group Inc
Defendant:
Cari Beck, Does, Carl Palmer and others
Parsons et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07098
Plaintiff:
Ann Parsons and Richard Parsons
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas v. Alvardo et al
as 3:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Edward Douglas
Defendant:
Robert Alvardo, Richard Parson and Don Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v Parsons et al
as 3:2009cv00481
Plaintiff:
Edward M Douglas
Defendant:
Richard Parsons and Robert A Alzarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
DOUGLAS v. PARSONS et al
as 2:2009cv02131
Petitioner:
EDWARD M DOUGLAS
Respondent:
RICHARD PARSONS and ROBERT A ALZARADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
DOUGLAS v. PARSONS et al
as 2:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M DOUGLAS
Defendant:
RICHARD PARSONS and ROBERT A ALZARADO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
