Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Price v. Warden
as 1:2021cv09468
Petitioner:
Scott Richard Price
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Price v. Sacramento County et al
as 4:2021cv09469
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Sacramento County, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. MILLER COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Nicholas Price, MILLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Kreg Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RICHARD PRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44594
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PRICE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Price et al
as 1:2021cv01782
Defendant:
Richard Price, ENC Holding Corporation and Evans Delivery Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kamya Smith and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Price et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 9:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard Price and Amanda Rushing Price
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and Newrez LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72512
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02678
Plaintiff:
Richard Price, II on behalf of Linda Palmer, deceased and Richard Price, II
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Demarcus Chatmon v. City of La Marque, Texas, et al
as 19-40106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMARCUS CHATMON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE SANTOS, CITY OF LA MARQUE, TEXAS, RICHARD PRICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
