Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Sharp v. Gretchen et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Richard Sharp
Defendant:
Gretchen and Tasha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29359
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chen Bing v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 22-1424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHEN BING and BING CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as the President of the United States, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his former official capacity as Secretary of State, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13604
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shannon v. East St. Louis Police Department
as 3:2019cv00379
Defendant:
East St. Louis Police Department, Richard Sharp, Juan McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shannon and Branden Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. ACS-Kings County, Division 2 Brooklyn NY et al
as 1:2018cv01798
Defendant:
Richard Sharpe, Nakia Williams, Mrs. El Saieh and others
Plaintiff:
Idzumi S. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard Sharp v. Justin Hammer
as 17-1100
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD SHARP
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN HAMMERS
Sharp v. Hammers et al
as 1:2016cv11061
Petitioner:
Richard Sharp
Respondent:
Justin Hammers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. USA
as 3:2016cv00335
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
