Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tiffany R. Love v. William Evans et al
as 2:2026cv08146
Plaintiff:
Tiffany R. Love doing business as Petra Publishing doing business as Beelara doing business as Positive Magazine doing business as TRL Media Group doing business as TRL Legal Group
Defendant:
William Evans, Windsong Plantation Homeowners Association, Inc., Dominguez Hills Village Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pac-Dent, Inc. v. Glo Science, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06199
Plaintiff:
Pac-Dent, Inc.
Defendant:
Glo Science, Inc. and Rick Hynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Holmes v. State Of Texas et al
as 1:2026cv00307
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gabriel Holmes
Defendant:
State Of Texas, TDCJ, Rick C Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eubanks v. City of Wetumpka et al (MAG+)
as 2:2026cv00596
Plaintiff:
Mark Eubanks
Defendant:
City of Wetumpka, Wetumpka Police Department, Officer Blaylock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Donahue v. Johnson, et al.
as 26-4601
Plaintiff:
BLEU BLAZE DONAHUE
Defendant:
ANDREW JOHNSON, STEVE H. HODDLE, STEVE AMBROSINI and others
Donahue, et al. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 26-4615
Plaintiff:
BLEU BLAZE DONAHUE
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC, ALPHABET INC., SUNDAR PICHAI and others
Debtor:
DOES, 1-#
Donahue v. Miles, et al.
as 26-4524
Defendant:
RICHARD L. WESENBERG, individually and as District Attorney for Douglas County, CAMERON MILES, individually and as Legal Counsel to Governor Tina Kotek, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
BLEU BLAZE DONAHUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
