Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Totten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ricky Alexander Totten
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Dillingham v. Debbie Asuncion
as 20-55834
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY ALEXANDER DILLINGHAM
Ricky Alexander Dillingham v. D. Jemison et al
as 2:2020cv00474
Plaintiff:
Ricky Alexander Dillingham
Defendant:
D. Jemison and D. Esparza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Dillingham v. Superior Court of California
as 19-55959
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY ALEXANDER DILLINGHAM
Addison v. Sabine River Authority of Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority of Texas , Entergy Texas, Inc. , Entergy Louisiana, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Addison , All Plaintiffs , Joyce Addison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ricky Alexander Dillingham v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2018cv01826
Petitioner:
Ricky Alexander Dillingham
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Fiallos v. The Lasik Vision Institute, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv81233
Plaintiff:
Ricky Alexander Fiallos
Defendant:
The Lasik Vision Institute, LLC and Ben L Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07021
Defendant:
Ricky Alexander, City of New York and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
