Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Yonna Acosta, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3617
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kyle Scruggs, Kris Douglas, Thomas Whitby and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jansen Ferguson, Darin Spurger, Thomas Holt and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Franks v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv01108
Defendant:
Ms. Terry Kennedy, PJ, . Painter and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Franks v. Gloucester County Prosecutors, et al
as 18-1864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY FRANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and MARY PIFFER
Defendant:
EMPLOYEES OF SUSQUEHANNA BANK and JOHN KOMOROWSKI
Franks v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2016cv01428
Plaintiff:
Ricky Franks
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McVickers v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00525
Petitioner:
Ricky Frank McVickers
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franks v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2012cv01457
Plaintiff:
Ricky Franks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
FRANKS v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2012cv03218
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ROBERT DAMMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY FRANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANKS v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 1:2012cv01681
Plaintiff:
RICKY FRANKS
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, MARY PIFFER, JOHN KOMOROWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
