Cases 31 - 40 of 476
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hawks v. Clark et al
as 7:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Hawks and Rocky Lee Hawks
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, Gregory P. Winston, John Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Autwain Worthy v. C&S Rail Services, LLC
as 22-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUTWAIN WORTHY
Plaintiff:
AUBREY MARSHALL, DAVID WALKER, RICKY LEE JONES, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C&S RAIL SERVICES, LLC
Hudson v. Executive Director et al
as 1:2022cv00717
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Hudson, Jr.
Respondent:
Executive Director and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricky Lee Pinzon v. Mitchell Crooks
as 2:2022cv01719
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Pinzon
Defendant:
Mitchell Crooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Hannay et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee
Defendant:
Patrick Dorr Hannay, Freight Zone Transportation, LLC, Sentry Select Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Chambers v. Lance et al
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
William R. Chambers
Defendant:
Rickie Lee Lance, Sheila Lance Patterson, Gelaine Willie Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Yauger v. Black
as 5:2021cv02279
Petitioner:
Rickie Lee Yauger
Respondent:
Warden Jennifre Gillece Black and Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Sgt. Klumpp
as 7:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cox and Ricky Lee Cox
Defendant:
Sgt. Klumpp, Marcus D. Zweiacker, Robert W Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
