Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wortham v. Ringco Oilfield Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2026cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tim Wortham
Defendant:
Ringco Oilfield Services, Inc. and Jared Ring
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Glenn v. DoorDash Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv14014
Plaintiff:
Terence N. Glenn
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber Eats and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Ring v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sandra Jeannette Cole Ring
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoid (PS) v. Malterud et al
as 1:2026cv03724
Plaintiff:
Edward Hoid
Defendant:
Jason Malterud, Jeff Satur, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heidary v. Amazon.com Inc.
as 26-2128
Plaintiff:
MASSOUD HEIDARY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC. and RING, LLC
Collins v. Rias et al
as 6:2026cv06106
Plaintiff:
Leticia Collins
Defendant:
Cristian Rias, Wes Smith, Ralph Charles Ohm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Rias et al
as 4:2026cv00767
Plaintiff:
Leticia Collins
Defendant:
Cristian Rias, Wes Smith, Ralph Charles Ohm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bmark 2020-B20 Ring Road, LLC v. Boruch Drillman
as 26-1631
Plaintiff:
BMARK 2020-B20 RING ROAD, LLC
Defendant:
BORUCH DRILLMAN, aka Barry
Haugland v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00375
Plaintiff:
Theodore Haugland
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Ring LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv08200
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
AGOOD-US, Allsky Group, Inc, avpjbc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
