Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WARNER RECORDS, INC. et al v ALTICE USA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
WARNER RECORDS, INC., ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, ATLANTIC RECORDS GROUP LLC and others
Defendant:
ALTICE USA, INC. and CSC HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 22-1451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ARISTA MUSIC, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NONESUCH RECORDS INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
Johnston v. Kroeger et al
as 1:2020cv00497
Defendant:
Roadrunner Records, Inc., Daniel Adair, Michael Kroeger and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Johnston
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant:
Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
BCS Computers LLC
Special Master:
Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
In Re Subpoena to IP-Echelon PTY, Ltd
as 2:2018mc00125
Defendant:
Grande Communications Networks LLC
Respondent:
IP Echelon PTY Ltd
Plaintiff:
Capitol Christian Music Group, Inc., Roadrunner Records, Inc., Arista Records LLC and others
In Re:
Subpoena to IP-Echelon PTY Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sony Music Entertainment et al v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00950
Plaintiff:
Universal Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Grande Communications Networks LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00613
Plaintiff:
Fonovisa, Inc., Roc-A-Fella Records, LLC, Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Respondent:
Recording Industry Association of America
Defendant:
Grande Communication Networks LLC, Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. and Grande Communications Networks LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Grande Communications Networks LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00365
Plaintiff:
Arista Music, Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation and others
Defendant:
Grande Communications Networks LLC and Patriot Media Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
