Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chester v. Jividen et al.
as 2:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Chester
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Donald Ames, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Chester v. Grane Health Care, et al
as 11-2978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. CHESTER, Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board for Region Six, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant - Appellee:
GRANE HEALTH CARE and EBENSBURG CARE CENTER LLC, DBA Cambria Care Center, Single Employer
Robert Chester v. Grane Health Care, et al
as 11-2573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT W. CHESTER, Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board for Region Six, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant - Appellant:
GRANE HEALTH CARE and EBENSBURG CARE CENTER, LLC, DBA Cambria Care Center, Single Employer
CHESTER v. GRANE HEALTHCARE CO. AND/OR EBENSBURG CARE CENTER, LLC
as 3:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. CHESTER
Defendant:
GRANE HEALTHCARE CO. AND/OR EBENSBURG CARE CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
CHESTER v. GRANE HEALTHCARE CO. et al
as 3:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. CHESTER
Defendant:
GRANE HEALTHCARE CO. and EBENSBURG CARE CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Chester v. Vincent/Metro Trucking, LLC
as 0:2009cv01164
Plaintiff:
Robert W Chester
Defendant:
Vincent/Metro Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Type:
Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Chester v. CMPJ Enterprises
as 0:2007cv02530
Plaintiff:
Robert W Chester
Defendant:
CMPJ Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Chester v. Eichorn Motors, Inc.
as 0:2007cv02384
Plaintiff:
Robert W Chester
Defendant:
Eichorn Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
