Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv01495
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gale Johnson , Ernest Wade Johnson and Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee , Robert Arnold , Ken Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Arnold et al
as 3:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
William L. Lewis
Defendant:
Robert Arnold, Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Rutherford County Deputies and Jail Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield et al v. Arnold et al
as 3:2015cv01269
Plaintiff:
Dannie Brumfield and Josh Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Arnold and Rutherford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Rutherford County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv01016
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anderson
Defendant:
Rutherford County Jail and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Arnold v. Howmedica Osteonicst al
as 0:2015cv02944
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Rutherford County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Roy Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Rutherford County Jail, Robert Arnold, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept. - Maintenance Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01465
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Hayes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv04255
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold Hayes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
