Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Thompson v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
Robert B Thompson
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Strougo v. Barclays PLC
as 16-1912
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Joseph Waggoner, Mohit Sahni and Barbara Strougo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Chris Lucas, Tushar Morzaria and Bob Diamond
Defendant - Appellant:
Barclays PLC, Robert Diamond, Antony Jenkins and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Paul A. Atkins, Elizabeth Cosenza and others
Ceres Protein, LLC et al v. Thompson Mechanical & Design et al
as 3:2014cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ceres Protein, LLC and Roger D. Shannon
Defendant:
Thompson Mechanical & Design , Barry R. Thompson and Robert B. Thompson
Thirdparty_defendant:
Michael Tarullo, Jr., John Does 1-5 and ABC Corporation 1-5
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Thompson Mechanical & Design , Robert B. Thompson and Barry R. Thompson
Counter_claimant:
Thompson Mechanical & Design , Robert B. Thompson and Barry R. Thompson
Counter_defendant:
Ceres Protein, LLC and Roger D. Shannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cherri et al v. Mueller, III et al
as 2:2012cv11656
Plaintiff:
Abdulrahman Cherri , Wissam Charafeddine , Ali Suleiman Ali and others
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Jerome Fisher, John S Pistole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. State of Maryland - Department of Transportation et al
as 8:2009cv00297
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Thompson
Defendant:
State of Maryland - Department of Transportation, MDTA Officer Badge #0701 and Three Unnamed John Doe Officers of the Maryland Transportation Authority Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
