Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bey et al v. Landon et al
as 8:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bolden Bey and Leonie Bolden Bey
Defendant:
Bill Landon, Stanley C. Middleman, Jefferey B. Lown, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IOU Central, Inc. v. United Apothecary, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00181
Defendant:
United Apothecary, Inc, George Ernest Riddle, Riddle Drugs and others
Plaintiff:
IOU Central, Inc. doing business as IOU Financial, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IOU Central, Inc. v. United Apothecary, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04738
Defendant:
United Apothecary, Inc., George Ernest Riddle, Riddle Drugs and others
Plaintiff:
IOU Central, Inc. doing business as IOU Financial, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Board of County Commissioner
as 10-2290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, BARBARA A. STINNETT, Commissioner, in her individual capacity and official capacity, LINDA KELLEY, Commissioner, in her individual capacity and official capacity and others
Hodge v. Calvert County (local government) et al
as 8:2010cv02396
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr.
Defendant:
Calvert County (local government), Board of County Commissioners, Barbara Stinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County
as 09-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR. and CHANTE' N. HODGE, Mrs.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVERT COUNTY, (local government), STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND STATE TREASURER and others
Hodge et al v. Calvert County et al
as 8:2009cv02252
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr. and Chante N. Hodge
Defendant:
Calvert County, State of Maryland, Maryland State Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
