Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McCasland v. Upshur County, Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00401
Defendant:
Alan Wade, Kacey Deluca, Lakisha Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Everette McCasland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emesowum v. Blackmon et al
as 4:2017cv02249
Plaintiff:
Benedict Emesowum
Defendant:
Robert Blackmon , Alan Rosen and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017mc01398
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Emesowum v. Blackmon et al
as 4:2016cv02963
Plaintiff:
Benedict Emesowum
Defendant:
Robert Blackmon , Alan Rosen and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emesowum v. Blackmon et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Benedict Emesowum
Defendant:
Robert Blackmon, Alan Rosen and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02423
Plaintiff:
Marian Blackmon and Robert Blackmon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean-Gilles et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2013cv21205
Plaintiff:
Max Jean-Gilles , Titus Adams , Miranda Adams and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Tate v. Lafayette County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Tate
Defendant:
Lafayette County, Mississippi, Mike Pickens, Johnny Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nowlin v. Lafayette County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ken Nowlin
Defendant:
Lafayette County, Mississippi, Johnny Morgan, Billy Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
