Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ray v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Lavario C. Ray
Defendant:
Robert Cook, City of Jacksonville, Richard Mantie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lavario C. Ray
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, State Attorney Office of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Officer of the Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2018cv00187
Petitioner:
Robert Cook
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Christopher LaRose, Charles Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooks v. New York Courts et al
as 1:2016cv09639
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooks
Defendant:
New York Courts, E. Greenberg, Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooks v. New York Courts et al
as 1:2016cv06754
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooks
Defendant:
Court Clerk, District Attorney, E. Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01320
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooks
Defendant:
The City of New York, GMDC, Personnell, Doctors, Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Garrett et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2011cv01121
Plaintiff:
Moses Tirell Baker
Defendant:
Stanley Garrett, Mike Rodgers, E. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Cook et al
as 8:2009cv01186
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Duncan
Defendant:
Robert Cook, Chuck Fraser, Harris Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robert Cook v. John Marshall
as 08-56243
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT COOK
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Robert Cook v. John Marshall
as 2:2008cv00835
Petitioner:
Robert Cook
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
