Cases 1 - 10 of 22
McKowen v. Morris, et al
as 26-1190
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. MCKOWEN
Defendant:
WISTAR MORRIS, GREG HARRINGTON, TWO RIVERS FARMS F-2, INC. and others
Yaculak et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2025cv06719
Plaintiff:
Vicki Yaculak and Holly Lee
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., CREATIVE HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
In re: McKowen, et al
as 25-1361
Petitioner:
JOHN R. MCKOWEN
Respondent:
WISTAR MORRIS, GREG HARRINGTON, TWO RIVERS FARMS F-2, INC. and others
Finks v. Bisignano
as 3:2025cv50165
Plaintiff:
Robert Finks
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clark v. Weiser et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser, India Kidd-Aaron, Robert Finke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finks v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00630
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Finks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fink v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00997
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finks v. Saul
as 1:2019cv08078
Plaintiff:
Robert Finks
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
