Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Povoski v. LaValley et al
as 9:2011cv00120
Defendant:
R. Carine, Kevin Hart, Daniel Clancy and others
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Povoski, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Harden v. Brian Gage, et al
as 14-3209
Petitioner - Appellant:
Robert Harden
Respondent - Appellee:
Brian Gage, Warden and Robert Houston, Director of Department of Corrections
Harden v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00691
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harden v. Gage et al
as 8:2013cv00356
Respondent:
Brian Gage and Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wills v. Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2012cv03090
Plaintiff:
Martin Wills
Defendant:
Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of , Mountain Home Police Department, City of , Carry Manuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. Britten et al
as 4:2011cv03084
Respondent:
Fred Britten and Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harden v. Yah et al
as 4:2008cv03259
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
M.A. Yah, Wells Fargo Bank and 1st National of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Harden v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2007cv03154
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Des Moine, Mallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harden v. Oppy
as 4:2007cv03054
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Myra Diane Oppy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
