Cases 41 - 50 of 301
Harris v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL LTD,
as 2:2021cv04938
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris, III
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL LTD,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2021cv01877
Petitioner:
Robert Harry Thomas
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Laurel Harry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03271
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, BASF Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61037
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopevillage Enterprise v. Shawn Palmer
as 21-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOPEVILLAGE ENTERPRISE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN PALMER, ROBERT HARRIS, KAREN A. GOULD and others
Blanton et al v. Fowler et al
as 5:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
William E. Blanton and Glenn Odom
Defendant:
Justin Fowler, Robert Harris, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutzler et al v. Nuclear Security, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hutzler, Chad Acres, Chelsea Adkisson and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HARRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41671
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Shannon Robert Harris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McPherson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04058
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris McPherson
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Steven Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
