Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Healy v. Fluor Intercontinental Inc et al
as 6:2021cv01018
Plaintiff:
Robert Healy
Defendant:
Fluor Government Group International Inc, Fluor Intercontinental Inc and Alliance Project Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Longo et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00585
Plaintiff:
Robert Healy, Keyshla Velez, Joe Darg and others
Defendant:
GoSmith Inc., Matthew Ehrlichman, Darwin Widjaja and others
Loquasto et al v. Fluor Corporation Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01455
Plaintiff:
Robert Healy, Hannah Mason, Julianne Perry and others
Defendant:
Flour Government Group, Inc., Alliance Project Services, Inc., Flour Enterprises, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Marvin T Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CLARK et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv01044
Plaintiff:
DAVID CLARK , KEITH A FEATHER , JORGE LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Padmanabhan v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid, et al
as 15-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANABHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD and WILLIAM KASSLER
Defendant:
SIMON AHTARIDIS, M.D., MOACIR BARBOSA, ALLISON BAYER and others
Respondent:
JULIAN HARRIS, JAMES PAIKOS, STEPHEN HOCTOR and others
In Re: Padmanabhan
as 15-1638
Petitioner:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANBHAN
Respondent:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD, WILLIAM KASSLER and others
Aldrich v. City of Cambridge et al
as 1:2012cv12273
Plaintiff:
Robert Aldrich
Defendant:
City of Cambridge, David Maher, Robert Healy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Peden v. Robert Healy, et al
as 1:2009cv10851
Plaintiff:
Ronald Peden
Defendant:
Robert Healy, Annette Rodibaugh and E. Denise Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
