Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Taft et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr, Arthur James Triplett, Jr, Jason Lee Cook and others
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Terry Branstad, Kelly Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Brauer et al
as 4:2017cv02739
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clemons
Defendant:
Joseph Brauer, Chris Pappas, Nels C. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Johnson v. Emelia Caputo, et al
as 17-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EMELIA CAPUTO, DR. VICTORIA GRESSNER, DEBORAH WILSON and others
Robert Meyers v. OH, et al
as 15-3570
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT MEYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and DANIEL DUNLAP
Meyers v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2014cv01694
Petitioner:
Robert Meyers
Respondent:
State of Ohio and Daniel Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meyers v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2014cv01505
Petitioner:
Robert Meyers
Respondent:
State of Ohio and Daniel Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEYERS v. HYATT et al
as 2:2013cv06043
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MEYERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HYATT, JACYLEN OTTINO, L. HASKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCADIA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PA et al
as 5:2012cv05655
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. LOCADIA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE et al
as 2:2011cv06566
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CAPUTO et al
as 5:2011cv02603
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
EMELIA CAPUTO , VICTORIA GESSNER , WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
