Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
Melissa Wilson, David Wilson, Wanda Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Payne v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jarvis Payne
Defendant:
State of Texas, BCADC, Pre-Trial Bond Officer 1 [43820], in and for the State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUNOZ v. NORTHEAST LOGISTICS INC.
as 2:2022cv04619
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MUNOZ
Defendant:
NORTHEAST LOGISTICS INC. doing business as DILIGENT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munoz et al v. Clay & Domingue, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01414
Plaintiff:
James Eric Short, Juventino Castillon, Robert Munoz and others
Defendant:
Clay & Domingue, LLC and Darrin Clay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MUNOZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78401
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munoz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores-East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03275
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRANZ, JASON MENDEZ, THAD TANAKA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02233
Plaintiff:
Michael Franz, Jason Mendez, Thad Tanaka and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Robert Munoz v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-50641
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT MUNOZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
