Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wiley v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles
as 5:2017cv00116
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Wiley
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiley v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2017cv00088
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Wiley
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv01242
Plaintiff:
Malachi Z. York
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Robert Wiley, Blake R. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hines v. Wiley et al
as 3:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Elwin L. Hines
Defendant:
Robert Wiley and Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard et al v. Hart et al
as 4:2011cv00840
Plaintiff:
Justin Leon Sheppard and Jerry Jones
Defendant:
Hart, Gaston, Kathy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mujahid v. Wiley, et al
as 10-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALIF ABDUL QAUI MUJAHID, AKA Keith E. Gaffney
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WILEY, Warden, CHRISTOPHER B. SYNSVOLL, Legal Supervisor, THERESA MONTOYA, Senior Attorney and others
Courtney Mathews v. Robert Wedemeyer, et al
as 09-6478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY B. MATHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WILEY WEDEMEYER, Judge, JERRY L. SMITH, Judge, DAVID H. WELLS, Judge and others
Courtney Mathews v. Robert Wedemeyer, et al
as 09-5931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY B. MATHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WILEY WEDEMEYER, Judge, JERRY L. SMITH, Judge, DAVID H. WELLS, Judge and others
Courtney Mathews v. Robert Wedemeyer, et al
as 09-5932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY B. MATHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WILEY WEDEMEYER, Judge, JERRY L. SMITH, Judge, DAVID H. WELLS, Judge and others
Joseph Johnson v. Michael Catalano, et al
as 09-5162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. CATALANO, Appellate Court Clerk, JERRY L. SMITH, DAVID H. WELLS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
