Cases
Rose v. Grappler Pressure Pumping
as 24-50251
Plaintiff: Jacob Rose, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Derrick Boyd, Roberto Castaneda and others
Defendant: Grappler Pressure Pumping, L.L.C.
Rose, et al v. Grappler Pressure Pumping, LLC.
as 7:2023cv00126
Plaintiff: Jacob Rose, Derrick Boyd, Roberto Castaneda and others
Defendant: Grappler Pressure Pumping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 WARN Act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
CASTANEDA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10586
Plaintiff: ROBERTO CASTANEDA
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. Legend Energy Services, LLC
as 7:2021cv00124
Plaintiff: Jacob Rose, Teddy Woods, Steven Edmond, Jr. and others
Defendant: Legend Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102
Type: Labor Labor: Other
CASTANEDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88333
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MARTIN ROBERTO CASTANEDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquez et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv00599
Plaintiff: Eduin Arturo Cambar Matute, Milton Francisco Lovos Marquez, Maria Marquez and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Trooper Mackey, Chad Ronk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castaneda v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
as 7:2018cv00111
Plaintiff: Roberto Castaneda, Jr.
Defendant: U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. and Connie Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castaneda v. United States District Court Eastern District of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01524
Plaintiff: Roberto Castaneda
Defendant: United States District Court Eastern District of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Roberto Castaneda-Diaz
as 0:2009cr00254
Defendant: Juan Roberto Castaneda-Diaz
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?