Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bridges v. Warden FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2019cv00030
Respondent:
Warden FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Rodney Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kris Battle, et al v. DIRECTV, Inc., et al
as 17-14523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRIS BATTLE, RUSSELL BLAKELY, RODNEY BRIDGES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTV, INC. and DIRECTV, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clivens et al v. Ray Brandt Nissan, Inc.
as 2:2017cv04884
Plaintiff:
Renwick Clivens, Harold Seals, Louis Roach and others
Defendant:
Ray Brandt Nissan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2016mc01490
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV LLC, Directv, Inc and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc00019
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC, DIRECTV, INC. and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Battle et al v. DIRECTV, Inc et al
as ALS/1:14-cv-02007
Plaintiff:
Kris Battle , Russell Blakely , Rodney Bridges and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc and DIRECTV, LLC
Battle et al v. DIRECTV, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02007
Plaintiff:
Kris Battle , Russell Blakely , Rodney Bridges and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc and DIRECTV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Antonio Acfalle et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Acfalle, Ernesto Alanis, Jr, Eric Aldrich and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC, DTV Home Services II LLC and others
USA v. Rodney Bridge
as 12-12040
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY BRIDGES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
