Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Murray v. Banister et al
as 2:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Roland M Murray
Defendant:
Terrie L Banister, Gaylon Lay, Rodney Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Rodney Ford
as 16-20344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY FORD
Corey Dewberry v. Rodney Ford, et al
as 16-2345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Corey Dewberry
Defendant - Appellee:
Rodney Ford, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, John Munn, Lieutenant, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Frank Scott, Sergeant, East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Ford et al v. Harrington et al
as 3:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ford
Defendant:
Joseph R Harrington, Landstar Ranger, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ford v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01872
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ford
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor v. Arkansas Parole Board et al
as 4:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
Robert C Taylor
Defendant:
Arkansas Parole Board, John Felts, Rodney Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. El Apple, LLC d/b/a Applebee's Neighborhood Bar and Grill, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ford
Defendant:
El Apple, LLC d/b/a Applebee's Neighborhood Bar and Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Dewberry v. Ford et al
as 2:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Corey Dewberry
Defendant:
Rodney Ford, John Munn, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Merkle Inc
as 4:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ford
Defendant:
Merkle Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Tommy Wimbush v. Rodney Ford, et al
as 11-2326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tommy Wimbush
Defendant - Appellee:
Rodney Ford, Lieutenant, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas Department of Corrections, originally sued as Ford and Cleaster Dean, Sargent, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas Department of Corrections, originally sued as Dean
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
