Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ramos Perez et al v. New Forces Construction LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
WALFRE RAMOS PEREZ, RONY RAMOS, JOSE RODOLFO PEREZ RAMOS and others
Defendant:
NEW FORCES CONSTRUCTION LLC, JULIO BRITO CASTILLO, DUBYA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Olman Perez Lopez v. William Barr
as 20-72859
Petitioner:
OLMAN RODOLFO PEREZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Rodolfo Perez-Jimenez
as 19-10123
Defendant / Appellant:
RODOLFO PEREZ-JIMENEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zavala v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2018cv00115
Defendant:
Jarvis Anderson, Sid Harle, Nicholas LaHood and others
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruben Zavala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodolfo Perez et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 5:2017cv01589
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Perez, Maria Perez and Maria Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez Serpas v. MJ's Labor Services, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00521
Defendant:
MJ's Labor Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Perez Serpas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Perez v. Brennan
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Perez and Rodolfo Perez
Defendant:
Brennan and Megan Brennan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Perez v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00749
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Perez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2016cv80776
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0206
Perez Batres v. Holder
as 14-1999
Petitioner:
ANDRES RODOLFO PEREZ BATRES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
