Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Potoczek v. Roebuck et al
as 1:2020cv01408
Defendant:
Brenda Roebuck, Ryan Roebuck and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Michael Potoczek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 2:2018cv00170
Defendant:
Carl E. Purdum, Jr. and Sears, Roebuck and Company
Plaintiff:
Ambrea Banks Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAY v. SUMMERS et al
as 2:2013cv06553
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BRAY
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. SUMMERS, JR. and SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roebuck v. Mercado-Perez et al
as 3:2013cv01142
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Roebuck
Defendant:
Angel Mercado-Perez , M & M Trucking, Inc. and Moha Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintron et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2013cv14278
Plaintiff:
Denise Cintron and David Cintron
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. , A&E Factory Service, LLC. and Michael Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ottero et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 8:2010cv02820
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Key Corporate Capital, Inc., William Lawrence WHITEHEAD, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Ottero and Savannah Ottero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SZEKERESH et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
LINDA A. SZEKERESH and STEPHEN J. SZEKERESH
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 09-60651
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LISA LEARMONTH
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
Roebuck v. McCallister
as 5:2009cv05111
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Roebuck
Defendant:
Grady McCallister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Porter v. Sears Warehouse et al
as 3:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
Sasha Porter
Defendant:
Sears Warehouse, Sears Warehouse, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
