Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Toone v. USA
as 2:2018cv00139
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roger Lewis Toone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roger Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-15543
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2016cv01267
Petitioner:
Timothy Roger Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Roger Coulter v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-1488
Petitioner - Appellant:
Roger Lewis Coulter
Respondent - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director Arkansas Department of Corrections, formerly known as Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01328
Petitioner:
Roger Lewis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smyre v. Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Bureau of
as 5:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis Smyre
Defendant:
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Bureau of
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smyre v. Statesville Police Department
as 5:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis Smyre
Defendant:
Statesville Police Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Lewis v. G. Pramstaller, et al
as 13-2262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. PRAMSTALLER, Medical Director and WILLIAM BORGERDING, named as WM. Borgerding , Regional Medical Official
Logue v. Saline County, KS Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2013cv03151
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis Logue, Sr.
Defendant:
Saline County, KS Sheriff Department, Alan Sites, J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis #225473 v. Pramstaller et al
as 2:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis #225473
Defendant:
G. J. Pramstaller and William Borgerding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
