Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Warner et al v. Mo-B, LLC et al
as 5:2026cv06014
Plaintiff:
Joann Warner, Yetkeever Warner and Yolanda Young
Defendant:
Mo-B, LLC, Mo-B Logistics, LLC and Sammy Lee Rolland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00142
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Booher v. McWane LLC
as 2:2026cv01071
Plaintiff:
Rolland Booher
Defendant:
McWane LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROLLAND v. SALES et al
as 5:2026cv00343
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE ROLLAND
Defendant:
TIMOTHY SALES, SOLOMON POPE, RUTHANE WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright-Solomon v. LNU
as 3:2026cv02609
Plaintiff:
Rolland Wright-Solomon
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacquelyn M. Rolland et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv07830
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn M. Rolland and Ja-quren Lydell Naulls
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Capt. B. Tolmasoff, Sgt. Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BRYANT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2026cv04845
Petitioner:
ROLLAND BRYANT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gourley v. MTX Materials, LP, et al.
as 4:2026cv03782
Plaintiff:
Alisha Gourley
Defendant:
MTX MATERIALS, LP, Jacob West, Richard Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rolland v. Kalamazoo, County of et al
as 1:2026cv01222
Plaintiff:
Antwon Dontae Rolland, II
Defendant:
Kalamazoo, County of and Duryl Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
