Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Campos v. Jewel Food Stores Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Campos
Defendant:
Jewel Food Stores Inc, NEW ALBERTSONS L.P., Frito-Lay Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hall v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
as 4:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ahmed v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
as 1:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Awais Ahmed
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP and Jose Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DOYLE v. ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES LP et al
as 1:2022cv06578
Defendant:
ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES LP, DAVID GUZMAN, HEATHER DELORENZO and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY M. DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Montgomery v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 7:2022cv06982
Plaintiff:
Starr Montgomery
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc, Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, L.P. and FL Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
